Content aggregators

Printer-friendly version

Upon the efficient consumption and summarizing of news from around the world.

I have been told to do this through twitter or facebook, but, seriously… no.
Those are systems designed to waste time with stupid distractions to benefit someone else.

Contrarily, I would like to find ways to summarise and condense information to save time for myself.

Telling me to use someone’s social website to gain information is like telling me to play poker machines to fix my financial troubles.. Stop it.

Feed readers

The classic.

You know what podcasts are?
Podcasts are a type of feed. An audio feed.
If I care about news articles and tumblr posts and whatever, not just audio, then I use feeds, feeds of text instead of audio. Any website can have a feed. Many do.



Remember when we thought the web would be a useful tool for researching and learning, and that automated research assistants would trawl the web for us?
RSS Feeds were often discussed as piece of that machine.

Little updates dripped from the web, to be sliced, diced, prioritised and analysed by our software to keep us aware of… whatever.

Most feed readers don’t do any of that fancy analysis though,
they just give you a list of new items ordered by date.
Still, whatever. Better than nothing.

  • commercial offerings

  • Indie-style

    I will run a server if the application is good enough, but it has to be worth the time investment. Let’s say between backups, security issues, confusing DNS failures etc, that’s 8 hours per year of miscellaneous computer wrangling, best case, and more hours if you have complicated things like some multi-user database like MySQL. Very few things are good enough to be worth the opportunity cost of that time.
    Why people insist on running enterprise databases to hold a reading list is an ongoing mystery to me. The capacity to scale to many users is nice, I suppose, but by that logic everyone should drive everywhere in a school bus.

    • miniflux is open-source, but also offers a hosted version for $15/year.
    • stringer looks like a nice little ruby app but need postgresql. Bloat!
    • tinytinyrss is the original “minimalist” RSS reader; it still need more databases than is sensible.
    • fever is a weird commercial ($30) application that you host on your own server. It claims to learn your information preferences, negating my previous complaint. But I cannot be arsed installing some database-wanting app with suspiciously machine-learning-inappropriate language requirements (PHP3) that also costs money to try, so I will never know.

See original: The Living Thing / Notebooks Content aggregators