http://ways.org/en/topics/open_notebooks The taxonomy view with a depth of 0. en http://ways.org/en/2008/jun/04/%5Bhour%5D%5Bmin%5D/%5Buser%5D/how_open_can_science_and_research_be <p>I am wondering how far we can get with "Open X" movements in science and research, and I will combine my musings about this with a recommendation to attend a satellite event at the <a href="http://www.esof2008.org/">Euroscience Open Forum 2008 in Barcelona</a>.</p> <p>First, let's consider how far we have come in terms of opening up the research process:<br /> * Open Access in the narrow sense, i.e. to published or at least peer-accepted research results, is real for a substantial share of research output and rapidly gaining ground (for most recent updates, click <a href="http://www.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/fosblog.html">here</a>).<br /> * Open Access to the scholarly review process is gaining ground (public or interactive peer review, e.g. <a href="http://www.atmospheric-chemistry-and-physics.net/review/index.html">here</a>).<br /> * Open Access to empirical data (<a href="http://sciencecommons.org/">Open Data</a>) is moving forward, too.<br /> * Open Access to software (<a href="http://www.opensource.org/">Open Source</a>) is driving many aspects of society, including wikis and many research projects.<br /> * Open Access to encyclopedic knowledge is becoming real on the heels of <a href="http://www.wikipedia.org">Wikipedia</a> and <a href="http://www.citizendium.org">Citizendium</a>.<br /> * Open Access to lab notebooks is being experimented with at <a href="http://openwetware.org/">OpenWetWare</a>.</p> <p>To sum up, there are not too many aspects of research that currently remain entirely in the dark. They basically boil down to grant writing (an attempt is <a href="http://wwmm.ch.cam.ac.uk/blogs/murrayrust/?p=645">here</a>) as well as the associated review and grant allocation procedures, bookkeeping (which is partly open in much of Scandinavia, within the wider framework of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_government">Open Government</a>), the actual research and data analysis, and to writing up the results for publication.</p> <p>I do not see any technical issues prohibiting complete openness of the whole research cycle, and so I deem it a valid<br /> target to aim at, already at the current stage of technology. However, people more involved with the practical implementation of these things may have more complex views on these matters, and so I am glad to see that such topics found their way into the program of ESOF 2008, in the form of a satellite event entitled <a href="http://sciencecommons.org/weblog/archives/2008/06/04/esof-2008-satellite-event-collaborating-for-the-future-of-open-science/"> Collaborating for the future of open science</a> where experts will discuss them.</p> http://ways.org/en/2008/jun/04/%5Bhour%5D%5Bmin%5D/%5Buser%5D/how_open_can_science_and_research_be#comments citizendium esof euroscience open access Open Data open notebooks open science Open Source OpenWetWare scientific cycle scientific method wiki wikipedia http://ways.org/en/crss/node/1085 Wed, 04 Jun 2008 18:17:15 -0400 daniel 1085 at http://ways.org